Lindsey Graham: Obama Lap Dog

“WAR! spit the Republicans… WAR! or thou art a coward!”

So when I and my Republican buddies at the Washington Post say we should not go to war with Russia, this is what you hear? No wonder you are a liberal.

I guess I am out of step with the straw man you have erected about Republican blood lust for war.

You move the goalposts by talking about Obama’s perceived weakness. There is no inconsistency in believing we should not go to war with Russia and believing Obama is weak,which seems to me to be an uncontroversial assessment of a president whose foreign policy started with the apology tour and then moved into phase II of “leading from behind.”

Strong statement from the Vietnam War party and a supporter of Obama, the great practitioner of execution by drone.

That the Dems could have stopped in the Senate but instead approved. It is the very model of bipartisanship. And keep telling yourself the lie bit.

Now you are lying (again). The forgeries were after the British report, and were possibly made to discredit it. I’m not going to do that retarded dance with you again, as you serially misrepresent the facts and what I post.

We’ve done that before as well. The Brits stood by the report, even after 2 inquests addressing your beloved forgeries, which they found had not impact on their position.

Why not just fault them for what they actually did? They cherry picked the intelligence that supported their narrative. That is not lying, it is advocacy. I think that is inappropriate in making a case for war, but it is not a lie. Yet that is not enough for the loony left, which must not only make their opponents seem wrong, but evil. That is pathetic.

You have lied repeatedly about the timing of the forgeries, and try to redefine words to suit your purposes, so LOL on you calling me a loser. If I am a loser, at least I own a dictionary and understand basic notions of logic. So again, what does that make you?

I said I would not go down this rabbit hole with you again, and this is precisely why. You are lying about what I said again. I never said there was no forgery. There was an Italian forgery, but it was not the basis for the British report. The forgery was created after the British report was generated and the British subsequently reaffirmed their findings even in light of the forgery. Bush was relying on British intelligence findings that had absolutely nothing to do with the forgery. Those are facts. They are clearly set forth in the Hitchens article I linked the last time. You can ignore them all you want, but it just makes you look more irrational. My last post on this, so shout “forgery” to your heart’s content.

How many foaming at the mouth warmongers that you know vote Democratic?

He wouldn’t have unilaterally dropped missile defense. He wouldn’t have done the apology tour or the reset nonsense. I feel fairly comfortable he would not have made every wrong choice in every Middle East crisis (failing to support Iranian protesters, the Syrian debacle, abandoning our ally in Egypt, turning on momar in Libya after he gave up his WMD, Benghazi, etc). I can’t think of a single country we have better relations with since Obama was elected. That bungling has consequences, as the WaPo explained.

The sky probably does seem to be falling if you live in Ukraine. Or Syria. Or Libya.

I would rather live in that country than liberal land (otherwise known as Detroit).

What does that say about you then, that you keep getting corrected by someone as dumb as me? Plain and Bachman aren’t really my cup of “tea”, but I think we both know you will never accomplish a fraction of what either has. But what would a liberal do without his wholly undeserved feelings of intellectual superiority?

that you keep getting corrected by someone as dumb as me?
———
it says that you’re a victim of the Dunning Kruger effect.